<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Finance Corporation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://financecorporation.com.au/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://financecorporation.com.au</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 05:41:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by photo uploading</title>
		<link>http://financecorporation.com.au/about/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>photo uploading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 05:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financecorporation.com.au/?page_id=2#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Well, I agree with what you wrote, but not with all of it. Regardless, it is all good material. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I agree with what you wrote, but not with all of it. Regardless, it is all good material. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Construction finance by Felicitas Grim</title>
		<link>http://financecorporation.com.au/construction-finance/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Felicitas Grim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financecorporation.com.au/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Stumbled upon your blog post via live search the other day and absolutely adore it. Continue the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stumbled upon your blog post via live search the other day and absolutely adore it. Continue the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Construction finance by Moses Caffrey</title>
		<link>http://financecorporation.com.au/construction-finance/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Moses Caffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financecorporation.com.au/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>This is a superb post and may be one that ought to be followed up to see what goes on

A pal mailed this link the other day and I&#039;m eagerly awaiting your next content. Carry on on the first-rate work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a superb post and may be one that ought to be followed up to see what goes on</p>
<p>A pal mailed this link the other day and I&#8217;m eagerly awaiting your next content. Carry on on the first-rate work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Finance Broking Referals by Claudio</title>
		<link>http://financecorporation.com.au/finance-broking-referals/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 05:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financecorporation.com.au/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Get referral arrangements in order,
By Kevin Eddy &#124; 20 Aug 2010 Connective principal Mark Haron has warned brokers to get their referral arrangements in order before October or risk falling foul of ASIC.

Speaking after an MFAA breakfast briefing on the subject, Haron warned that brokers should be putting referral agreements in place with key partners before rules regulating referrals come into force on 1 October.

&quot;The National Consumer Credit Protection Act impacts on referrers, as ASIC’s view is that they are an intermediary,&quot; he told Broker News. &quot;However, ASIC have allowed exemptions to referrers so that they do not have to obtain an ACL or become a credit representative to continue referring.&quot;

Brokers and lenders must, by 1 October, have an agreement with referrers not already covered by the credit regime, explains Haron This must specify the conduct in which the referrer can engage. Licensees must also keep a register of referrers, which includes the date and the means by which the agreement the referrer was entered into, and the date of commencement of referrals.

There are also restrictions around the practice of referring, he adds: namely, that a referrer must give the information to the broker or lender within five business days after advising the customer, the broker or lender must contact the consumer within 10 business days of receiving the referral, and the broker or lender must advise the consumer if the referrer will receive a commission for the referral.

Additionally, referrers must not conduct business by contacting people from non-standard business premises – this, Haron warns, may include open houses.

&quot;This issue with open houses revolves around whether there is sufficient notification to the client that his or her details may be passed on – even if he or she has put his or her name on a contact list and if there&#039;s a note at the bottom saying their details may be passed on.

Clarification is currently being sought from ASIC on this question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get referral arrangements in order,<br />
By Kevin Eddy | 20 Aug 2010 Connective principal Mark Haron has warned brokers to get their referral arrangements in order before October or risk falling foul of ASIC.</p>
<p>Speaking after an MFAA breakfast briefing on the subject, Haron warned that brokers should be putting referral agreements in place with key partners before rules regulating referrals come into force on 1 October.</p>
<p>&#8220;The National Consumer Credit Protection Act impacts on referrers, as ASIC’s view is that they are an intermediary,&#8221; he told Broker News. &#8220;However, ASIC have allowed exemptions to referrers so that they do not have to obtain an ACL or become a credit representative to continue referring.&#8221;</p>
<p>Brokers and lenders must, by 1 October, have an agreement with referrers not already covered by the credit regime, explains Haron This must specify the conduct in which the referrer can engage. Licensees must also keep a register of referrers, which includes the date and the means by which the agreement the referrer was entered into, and the date of commencement of referrals.</p>
<p>There are also restrictions around the practice of referring, he adds: namely, that a referrer must give the information to the broker or lender within five business days after advising the customer, the broker or lender must contact the consumer within 10 business days of receiving the referral, and the broker or lender must advise the consumer if the referrer will receive a commission for the referral.</p>
<p>Additionally, referrers must not conduct business by contacting people from non-standard business premises – this, Haron warns, may include open houses.</p>
<p>&#8220;This issue with open houses revolves around whether there is sufficient notification to the client that his or her details may be passed on – even if he or she has put his or her name on a contact list and if there&#8217;s a note at the bottom saying their details may be passed on.</p>
<p>Clarification is currently being sought from ASIC on this question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Commercial by claudio</title>
		<link>http://financecorporation.com.au/commercial/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>claudio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 04:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financecorporation.com.au/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>No rationale for SME credit regulation 
By Ben Abbott &#124; 16 Aug 2010 Small business borrowers are adequately protected by existing legislation and do not require further regulation under the National Credit Reform Phase 2 legislation, according to a group of WA brokers.

Finance Solutions&#039; Raymond Weir, in concert with an informal group of brokers involved in the small business and private mortgage market, has put forward comment as part of the Phase 2 consultation, which ended last week.

Weir argues the Trade Practices Act, the ASIC Act and state fair trading laws have protected small business borrowers in the past, and the incidence of complaints from this type of borrower has been negligible. They can also avail themselves of remedies including industry codes, such as the Banking Code of Practice.

&quot;Further government regulation of credit for small business borrowers is not sought by any stakeholder or consumer advocate and is unwarranted,&quot; the submission states. &quot;Any further regulation of credit for small business should be limited to requiring the credit provider or intermediary to hold adequate PI insurance and be a member of an EDR.&quot;

Weir argues further regulation could have negative effects on the sector. &quot;If the government was to place a further layer of regulation upon credit for small business, similar to those applicable to personal borrowers, it is likely to restrict the availability of small business credit,&quot; Weir said.

Weir argues that persons owning and operating a small business either as a Sole Trader, Partner or Company Director are to his mind sufficiently experienced and knowledgeable to protect their own interests when obtaining credit.

He said further regulation was likely to further restrict already depleted competition in the banking sector, as non-bank lenders - experienced in meeting the often special needs of small business borrowers - may be forced out of the market, as they face difficulties in meeting extensive compliance standards.

The provision of &quot;start-up&quot; finance, often secured by the family home or an investment property, is better served by more flexible and less risk averse non-bank and private lenders, he adds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No rationale for SME credit regulation<br />
By Ben Abbott | 16 Aug 2010 Small business borrowers are adequately protected by existing legislation and do not require further regulation under the National Credit Reform Phase 2 legislation, according to a group of WA brokers.</p>
<p>Finance Solutions&#8217; Raymond Weir, in concert with an informal group of brokers involved in the small business and private mortgage market, has put forward comment as part of the Phase 2 consultation, which ended last week.</p>
<p>Weir argues the Trade Practices Act, the ASIC Act and state fair trading laws have protected small business borrowers in the past, and the incidence of complaints from this type of borrower has been negligible. They can also avail themselves of remedies including industry codes, such as the Banking Code of Practice.</p>
<p>&#8220;Further government regulation of credit for small business borrowers is not sought by any stakeholder or consumer advocate and is unwarranted,&#8221; the submission states. &#8220;Any further regulation of credit for small business should be limited to requiring the credit provider or intermediary to hold adequate PI insurance and be a member of an EDR.&#8221;</p>
<p>Weir argues further regulation could have negative effects on the sector. &#8220;If the government was to place a further layer of regulation upon credit for small business, similar to those applicable to personal borrowers, it is likely to restrict the availability of small business credit,&#8221; Weir said.</p>
<p>Weir argues that persons owning and operating a small business either as a Sole Trader, Partner or Company Director are to his mind sufficiently experienced and knowledgeable to protect their own interests when obtaining credit.</p>
<p>He said further regulation was likely to further restrict already depleted competition in the banking sector, as non-bank lenders &#8211; experienced in meeting the often special needs of small business borrowers &#8211; may be forced out of the market, as they face difficulties in meeting extensive compliance standards.</p>
<p>The provision of &#8220;start-up&#8221; finance, often secured by the family home or an investment property, is better served by more flexible and less risk averse non-bank and private lenders, he adds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Residential Low Doc Loans by claudio</title>
		<link>http://financecorporation.com.au/residential-low-doc-loans/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>claudio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 04:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financecorporation.com.au/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Regulation will restrict credit: MFAA 
By Ben Abbott &#124; 17 Aug 2010 There is no evidence any further legislative reform is required to regulate credit for small businesses, and any regulation is likely to hurt the sector by restricting available funds, the MFAA has said.

In its response to the government&#039;s second phase of National Credit Reform, the MFAA has argued in a submission to Treasury that there is no evidence of poor lending practices at the margin in the small business sector, as was the case in the residential sector.

“Unlike residential mortgages, lending to small businesses requires greater scrutiny by lenders and brokers,” MFAA chief executive Phil Naylor said. “We are concerned regulation would restrict the availability of credit to small businesses which will be of significant detriment,” he added.

The position supports that of a group of WA brokers headed by Finance Solutions&#039; Ray Weir, which also argued in a submission to Treasury that regulation would impinge the ability of small busines to access credit.

The MFAA&#039;s submission states that the industry has already undergone major changes as part of the first phase of NCR, and that &quot;the combination of these reforms will have a significant affect on the credit market, even in respect of credit which is not regulated by the NCCP Act&quot;.

The industry body said time should be given to see how these already legislated initiatives work in practice, and that sufficient regulatory tools are now available to protect consumers and small business and drive out predatory lenders.

The submission goes on to say that regulation is a &quot;two-edged sword&quot; that could impact borrowers and reduce commercial flexibility and innovation, and that there was no evidence borrowers were seeking greater protection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regulation will restrict credit: MFAA<br />
By Ben Abbott | 17 Aug 2010 There is no evidence any further legislative reform is required to regulate credit for small businesses, and any regulation is likely to hurt the sector by restricting available funds, the MFAA has said.</p>
<p>In its response to the government&#8217;s second phase of National Credit Reform, the MFAA has argued in a submission to Treasury that there is no evidence of poor lending practices at the margin in the small business sector, as was the case in the residential sector.</p>
<p>“Unlike residential mortgages, lending to small businesses requires greater scrutiny by lenders and brokers,” MFAA chief executive Phil Naylor said. “We are concerned regulation would restrict the availability of credit to small businesses which will be of significant detriment,” he added.</p>
<p>The position supports that of a group of WA brokers headed by Finance Solutions&#8217; Ray Weir, which also argued in a submission to Treasury that regulation would impinge the ability of small busines to access credit.</p>
<p>The MFAA&#8217;s submission states that the industry has already undergone major changes as part of the first phase of NCR, and that &#8220;the combination of these reforms will have a significant affect on the credit market, even in respect of credit which is not regulated by the NCCP Act&#8221;.</p>
<p>The industry body said time should be given to see how these already legislated initiatives work in practice, and that sufficient regulatory tools are now available to protect consumers and small business and drive out predatory lenders.</p>
<p>The submission goes on to say that regulation is a &#8220;two-edged sword&#8221; that could impact borrowers and reduce commercial flexibility and innovation, and that there was no evidence borrowers were seeking greater protection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by janine</title>
		<link>http://financecorporation.com.au/about/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>janine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 03:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financecorporation.com.au/?page_id=2#comment-2</guid>
		<description>
09 August 2010 



 

 
Limited outlook for low-docs
Low-doc lending will remain a product available to a particular niche clientele, but is unlikely to ever revive back to the levels seen in 2007 and 2008, according to LMI provider Genworth Financial. 




HSBC &#039;no plans&#039; to use brokers
Despite indications last week HSBC would look to expand its mortgage lending book after a strong profit announcement, the bank has confirmed it will not reconsider using third party introducers
 


 

ING Direct cuts fixed rates
ING Direct has moved to lower interest rates on its fixed rate home loan products
 
SEQUAL cautions against rushed regulation
The peak body for Australia&#039;s equity release industry has issued a warning to the federal government that regulatory change should be &quot;carefully considered&quot; and take self-regulation into account
 
Stock levels still rising, warns SQM
Residential real estate listings continued to rise during July, according to SQM research
 


 

 
 

 









 

	 

 



 
 


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>09 August 2010 </p>
<p>Limited outlook for low-docs<br />
Low-doc lending will remain a product available to a particular niche clientele, but is unlikely to ever revive back to the levels seen in 2007 and 2008, according to LMI provider Genworth Financial. </p>
<p>HSBC &#8216;no plans&#8217; to use brokers<br />
Despite indications last week HSBC would look to expand its mortgage lending book after a strong profit announcement, the bank has confirmed it will not reconsider using third party introducers</p>
<p>ING Direct cuts fixed rates<br />
ING Direct has moved to lower interest rates on its fixed rate home loan products</p>
<p>SEQUAL cautions against rushed regulation<br />
The peak body for Australia&#8217;s equity release industry has issued a warning to the federal government that regulatory change should be &#8220;carefully considered&#8221; and take self-regulation into account</p>
<p>Stock levels still rising, warns SQM<br />
Residential real estate listings continued to rise during July, according to SQM research</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hello world! by Mr WordPress</title>
		<link>http://financecorporation.com.au/hello-world/#comment-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr WordPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 04:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financecorporation.com.au/?p=1#comment-1</guid>
		<description>Hi, this is a comment.&lt;br /&gt;To delete a comment, just log in and view the post&#039;s comments. There you will have the option to edit or delete them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, this is a comment.<br />To delete a comment, just log in and view the post&#039;s comments. There you will have the option to edit or delete them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

